RAID Calculator
Calculate usable storage, fault tolerance, and space efficiency for RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10 arrays with any number of drives.
About RAID Calculator
RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) combines multiple drives into a single logical volume for speed, redundancy, or both. This calculator shows the usable capacity, space efficiency, fault tolerance, and minimum drive count for RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10 across any drive configuration you enter.
RAID Levels at a Glance
| RAID Level | How It Works | Min Drives | Usable Capacity | Fault Tolerance | Read Speed | Write Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 0 (Stripe) | Data split across all drives in blocks | 2 | N x drive size (100%) | None - one failure loses everything | Excellent (N x single drive) | Excellent (N x single drive) |
| RAID 1 (Mirror) | Identical copy on each drive | 2 | 1 x drive size (50%) | N-1 drives can fail | Good (reads from any mirror) | Normal (writes to all mirrors) |
| RAID 5 (Stripe + Parity) | Data striped with distributed parity | 3 | (N-1) x drive size | 1 drive | Good | Slower (parity calculation) |
| RAID 6 (Stripe + Double Parity) | Data striped with two parity blocks | 4 | (N-2) x drive size | 2 drives | Good | Slowest (double parity) |
| RAID 10 (Mirror + Stripe) | Striped across mirrored pairs | 4 (even) | N/2 x drive size (50%) | 1 per mirror pair | Excellent | Good |
Usable Capacity Formulas
The calculator applies these formulas to determine how much space you can actually use:
| RAID Level | Formula | Example: 4 x 4 TB Drives | Usable | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAID 0 | N x S | 4 x 4 TB | 16 TB | 100% |
| RAID 1 | S | 4 TB (mirrored 4 ways) | 4 TB | 25% |
| RAID 5 | (N - 1) x S | 3 x 4 TB | 12 TB | 75% |
| RAID 6 | (N - 2) x S | 2 x 4 TB | 8 TB | 50% |
| RAID 10 | (N / 2) x S | 2 x 4 TB | 8 TB | 50% |
N is the number of drives, S is the size of each drive. If drives have different sizes, most RAID controllers treat every drive as the size of the smallest one, wasting the extra capacity on larger drives. Use the storage converter if you need to translate between TB, GB, and other units.
How Space Efficiency Changes with Drive Count
RAID 5 and RAID 6 become more space-efficient as you add drives, because the fixed parity overhead is spread across more drives:
| Drive Count | RAID 0 | RAID 1 | RAID 5 | RAID 6 | RAID 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 drives | 100% | 50% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3 drives | 100% | 33% | 67% | N/A | N/A |
| 4 drives | 100% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 50% |
| 6 drives | 100% | 17% | 83% | 67% | 50% |
| 8 drives | 100% | 13% | 88% | 75% | 50% |
| 12 drives | 100% | 8% | 92% | 83% | 50% |
RAID 10 stays at 50% regardless of drive count because every drive has exactly one mirror. RAID 5 with 8 drives reaches 88% efficiency, which is why it is popular for NAS devices with many bays.
Choosing the Right RAID Level
| Use Case | Recommended RAID | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Video editing scratch disk | RAID 0 | Maximum speed and capacity, data is temporary and backed up elsewhere |
| Operating system / boot drive | RAID 1 | Simple redundancy, fast reads, easy to recover from a failure |
| Home NAS / media server | RAID 5 | Good balance of capacity and protection for 3-5 drives |
| Business file server | RAID 6 | Survives two simultaneous failures, important for large arrays where rebuild times are long |
| Database server | RAID 10 | Best random I/O performance with redundancy |
| Enterprise storage (large arrays) | RAID 6 or RAID 60 | Double parity is essential when rebuild of a single large drive takes 12-24 hours |
RAID Rebuild Times and Risk
When a drive fails in a RAID 5 or 6 array, the controller reconstructs the missing data from parity during a rebuild. This process stresses the remaining drives and takes time proportional to drive capacity:
| Drive Size | Approximate Rebuild Time (RAID 5) | Risk During Rebuild |
|---|---|---|
| 1 TB HDD | 2-4 hours | Low - short window of vulnerability |
| 4 TB HDD | 8-16 hours | Moderate - sustained stress on remaining drives |
| 8 TB HDD | 16-36 hours | High - another drive failure during rebuild loses everything |
| 16 TB HDD | 24-72 hours | Very high - this is why RAID 6 exists for large drives |
| 4 TB SSD | 1-3 hours | Low - SSDs rebuild much faster |
With modern drive sizes (8 TB+), RAID 5 is increasingly risky because a second drive failure during the long rebuild window means total data loss. This is why RAID 6 has become the standard recommendation for arrays with large HDDs.
RAID Is Not a Backup
This is the single most important thing to understand about RAID. RAID protects against drive failure only. It does not protect against:
| Threat | RAID Protects? | What Protects You |
|---|---|---|
| Single drive failure | Yes (RAID 1/5/6/10) | RAID redundancy |
| Accidental file deletion | No | Backups, snapshots, versioning |
| Ransomware / malware | No - encrypts all drives simultaneously | Offline or immutable backups |
| Controller failure | No - may corrupt the array metadata | Backups, matching spare controller |
| Fire, flood, theft | No | Off-site backup (cloud or physical) |
| Silent data corruption (bit rot) | Not in standard RAID | ZFS, Btrfs, or other checksumming file systems |
| Multiple simultaneous drive failures | Depends on RAID level | RAID 6 or 10 for two failures, backups for more |
The 3-2-1 backup rule applies regardless of RAID: three copies of data, on two different media types, with one copy off-site.
Hardware RAID vs Software RAID
| Type | How It Works | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware RAID | Dedicated RAID controller card with its own processor and cache | Fastest performance, offloads CPU, battery-backed cache prevents data loss during power failure | Expensive, controller failure can make data inaccessible, locked to that controller model |
| Software RAID (mdadm, Windows Storage Spaces) | OS manages RAID using the CPU | Free, portable between systems, no special hardware needed | Uses CPU resources, no battery-backed write cache |
| ZFS / Btrfs | File system with built-in RAID-like functionality | Data checksumming (catches bit rot), flexible configuration, snapshots | Higher RAM requirements (ZFS wants 1 GB per TB), learning curve |
| Fake RAID (motherboard RAID) | BIOS-level RAID using the chipset | Included with motherboard, no extra hardware | Slower than true hardware RAID, limited features, tied to that chipset |
To estimate bandwidth when transferring files to and from your array, check the file transfer calculator. All calculations run in your browser with no data sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between RAID 5 and RAID 6?
RAID 5 uses one drive's worth of space for parity and can survive one drive failure. RAID 6 uses two drives for parity, so it can survive two simultaneous failures. RAID 6 is safer for large arrays where the chance of a second failure during a rebuild is higher.
How much usable storage does RAID 10 give?
RAID 10 mirrors every drive, so you get exactly 50% of your total raw capacity as usable storage. Four 1 TB drives in RAID 10 give you 2 TB of usable space.
Is RAID 0 safe for everyday use?
RAID 0 offers no redundancy at all. If any single drive fails, you lose everything in the array. It is only suitable for temporary data, scratch disks, or situations where speed matters more than safety.
Can I mix different size drives in a RAID array?
Technically yes, but most RAID controllers will treat every drive as the size of the smallest one. A 1 TB drive and a 2 TB drive in RAID 1 gives you 1 TB of usable space, wasting half the larger drive.
Does RAID replace backups?
No. RAID protects against drive failure, but it does not protect against accidental deletion, ransomware, file corruption, or disasters. You still need a separate backup strategy.
Related Tools
Link to this tool
Copy this HTML to link to this tool from your website or blog.
<a href="https://toolboxkit.io/tools/raid-calculator/" title="RAID Calculator - Free Online Tool">Try RAID Calculator on ToolboxKit.io</a>